animus necandi

  Criminal law, crimes

He animus necandi It is also known as the desire to kill that a person has at the time of a crime. Although this definition does not clarify the concept, It must be understood that it is limited to the area of crime.

This where it is of special relevance to evaluate the seriousness of certain crimes and above all to distinguish between attempts to homicide. We talk about the reality in a person of the understanding that with their actions they produce a specific risk capable of causing the death of another person and the will to want to cause said result, that is, the intention to murder. 

That is why here we are going to tell you a little more about everything related to this topic, so you have all the information you need in your hands. So stay until the end of this article and find out everything related to this topic.

What is meant by Animus necandi?

We are dealing with a subjective factor, which must be evaluated by a judge or court. It is very important to highlight that the animus necandi is not determined completely automatically, this despite the fact that jurisprudence has specified certain circumstances to take into account. 

Are you looking for a lawyer specialized in Criminal Law?

we help you find a criminal lawyer.
We have a wide network of collaborating lawyers in all Spain.

These will serve to judge the author's intention, which are used arbitrarily in an exemplary manner. So data analysis is imperative, evidence and facts of each situation to determine the existence or not of the animus necandi

 On the contrary, in the case of an act done with the sole intention of causing harm to another person without the intention of causing death. There is talk of animus laedendi, and this act is classified as a crime. 

 In short, when ghosts exist, actions are performed with the express purpose of causing the death of others. 

The difference between the Animus necandi and the Animal Laedendi

Fraud is included by the reasoning and the will to execute an action aimed at creating the death of another. The proof of fraud in murder It was the subject of detailed interpretative structures in jurisprudence. 

This is to be able to differentiate from the object, more than anything, the cases of murder in the completed attempted stage in relation to the completed wounds. In the first case, the person who perpetuates with animus necandi, in the second his action is generated with animus laedendi; which means that fraud is then taken into account.

Fraud constitutes a personal factor, Therefore, your proof will have to be established primarily through the evidentiary modality of resources circumstantial or indicative. Which raises the demand for the execution of a judgment of inferences about the facts and objectively occurred and directly proven data. 

That is, one must start from the group of situations that have linked the act perpetrated. Always keeping in mind how many previous, simultaneous acts of the attacker or after the action offer some light on the secret background of his thoughts.

Examples of Animus necandi

 “It is like a completely valid beginning in cases where the consummation of the crime was not carried out completely. The obstacle to consummation through no fault of the representative, such as voluntarily resigning of the consummation of the crime that results in impunity for the crime that is aspired to or that is abandoned.”

 Volunteering is a certain mental attitude of renunciation that, from a preventive point of view, is considered worthy of sanction. Withdrawal may result in a sanction if the attempt has not yet failed and this depends on the will to succeed. 

On the contrary, if at any time the author makes a mistake in his objective and cannot achieve this despite continuing to act, his attempt will fail and withdrawal will not be granted.  After the defendant hit the victim for example with a machete, causing an injury. 

At the level of the right clavicle there is a 6 centimeter wound, otherwise in which he killed the victim, in this case he decided not to kill him. Therefore, it must be considered in this sub-case, in the event that the victim is lying on the ground, injured, unconscious and unable to defend himself.

He accused can kill him completely, but he does not do so, it was a clear sign of withdrawal from the act of murder.